1 Rank among Dutch Generals
One of the most important things to understand regarding the internal power struggle between the Dutch Generals is that after 1702 the 'eminent leader' (William III) had passed. This meant that in principle the seniority of the generals was marked first by their rank, then by the date they had attained it and then by their age. The tables illustrate the rank among the Dutch generals in 1702. One has to keep in mind here that the arms (Infantry, Cavalry and to some extent the Artillery) had their own chain of command and that only a field marshal or a specifically assigned commander of a body of troops held sway over all three1. Therefore there are two tables here; one for the cavalry and one for the infantry2.
|*FM 15 jul 1689||**FM 19 Oct 1702||***FM 11 April 1704||****FM 1708|
|*1697 MG of Art.||**1704 MG of Art.|
2 Attention for Dutch Generals in history
2.1 Appreciation till 1795
Up to about 1800 the Dutch had a proud military tradition, but nowadays litle is known about these soldiers and their achievements, especially those of the Spanish Succession War. Sources of knowledge about these men can either be contemporary, or date from the nationalist era (ca. 1850-1945). While the men fighting the Succession war got some attention from contemporary sources, they had very bad luck in getting attention from the nationalist historians.
In contemporary sources the Dutch soldiers probably got their fair due, or even more. There are sources that ascribe to them a very big role in the allied victories. An example is one that says the battle of Vigo was fought on the initiative of the Dutch admiral. However even in contemporary sources they probably got less attention than their colleques from other nations. The 'Burgher' culture that has dominated the Dutch state since it's foundation simply did not appreciate warfare as a virtue in the way kingdoms did.
2.2 Little Recognition in the nationaliste era
The primary reasons for Dutch generals not getting attention from the historians of the nationalist era (ca. 1850-1945) are different. The Dutch golden age was and is the primary focus-point of Dutch historians, and by 1700 it had ended. The Dutch also have great artistic, commercial and naval traditions, that eclipse the miltary tradition. For the Dutch their golden age is marked by Rembrandt, Vermeer, the VOC, De Ruyter and Tromp, not by military achievements on land. The deeds of the house of Orange however did attract the attention of the 'nationalist' historians, but sadly no Oranges were ruling at the time. (I have no doubt whatsoever that a lot more would have been written about e.g. Ramillies had a stadholder been present at that battle.)
2.3 Military history a hobby
After the second world war one can say that writing about history had definitely changed. Whereas it used to lay great stress on warfare and the acts of kings, it now studies all aspects of history far more evenly, and military history has been all but left to the hobby-historians. For the soldiers of the Spanish Succession War this means that they do not have to expect much attention from today's historians.
|1) I do not know how this worked exactly in cases of equal rank. Some nations let the cavalry commander give the orders while in the field and let the infantry commander order while in a town.|
|2) These tables are primarily based on the tables in 'Het Staatse Leger' part VII and the Heinsius Archive.|
|3) Dopff was appointed General of Dragoons in 1696|
|4) Friedrich Ulrich count of Ostfriesland-Kriechingen|
|5) Johan Theodoor Baron of Friesheim|
|6) Count Bengt of Oxenstierna, son of the chancellor or Sweden|
|7) Charles William baron of Sparre, of Swedish origin|