Organization of armies
The Infantry
Administrative organization and battlefield organization
At the time of the Spanish Succession war there was still a big difference between the administrative organization and the battlefield organization of armies. The smallest administrative organizational unit was the company numbering from 40 (France) to 200 (Swiss) men. The regiment was an administrative unit made up out of companies. Originally the battalion was a battlefield unit made up out of companies or sometimes even regiments. Around 1700 in most countries the battalion already was or was becoming also an administrative organizational unit, with the battalion staying together when the battle was over. The tendency was that a regiment could form 1 (Dutch) - 4 (Austrian) battalions on the battlefield. On the battlefield these battalions would then be grouped in and commanded as brigades numbering 2-6 battalions. To sum it up:
- Administrative organization: regiments divided into companies
- Battlefield organization: brigades made up out of battalions
Battalion strength in some European armies
With regiments varying in size and in the number of companies and the number of men that were in these companies it might be nice to sum some up the theoretical strength of the units of some nations: (effective strength might be half these)
| Country | Btns./Rgt. | Co's in Btn. | Co. size | Btn.size | Rgt.size |
| France | mostly 2 | 13 | 50 | 650 | 1300 |
| Austria | 4 | 4 (+1 Gr./ Rgt). | 150(100) | 600+ | 2500 |
| Prussia | 2 | 5 | 145 | 725 | 1450 |
| Bavaria | 3 | 5 | 140 | 700 | 2100 |
| Bavarian militia | 2 | 3 | 200 | 600 | 12001 |
| England | 1 | 12+1 | 71 | 923 | 923 |
| United Provinces | 1 | 12 | 71 | 852 | 852 |
| UP Switsers | 2 | 4 | 200 | 800 | 1600 |
| Spain up to 1704 | Tercio | 12 | 78 | 550-936 | - |
| Spanish Netherlands from 1703 | 1-2 | ? | 650 | ? |
The company was commanded by a captain, a lieutenant, a 2nd lieutenant, an ensign and a number of sergeants. The regiment was commanded by a colonel (or colonel-commandant if the colonel also had a higher command), a lieutenant-colonel, a major, and under them the companies' commanders. I could go on explaining about how a battalion was in the field divided into divisions and platoons, but never having read much about platoons in battle this would only complicate matters
The French Infantry battalion
Here is a good description of the French infantry battalion2: In 1702 the French infantry battalion was composed of 13 companies of 50 men each. 12 Of these were normal companies containing 37 riflemen, 10 Pikemen, 2 sergeants with halberds and 1 drummer. The thirteenth company was the grenadier company all armed with muskets. For each company one also has to add: A captain; a lieutenant3 and a sub lieutenant. On the regimental level there were: The colonel (or Colonel Commandant), the Lieutenant-Colonel, the Major, 2-3 Aide Majors, the doctor, the priest and the prévôt (Military police).
The Cavalry
Like the infantry the cavalry was made up of the administrative and battlefield units. The administrative unit was likewise called regiment and divided into companies. The battlefield unit was called squadron, and was made up out of companies. Some examples:
- Austria: Regiment of 10-12 companies of about 75 men, building 5-6 squadrons
- France: Regiment of 4-6 companies of about 50 men building 2 squadrons
- United Provinces: Regiment of 6 companies of 78 men building 2 squadrons
The Artillery
The artillery was at this time still (or only just) organized into companies. Administered by some nations in two regiments or battalions with one being the field gun regiment/battalion and the other siege-gun regiment, but this is not relevant to our story. What is relevant is that a lot of battalions had their battalion or regimental guns, mostly 2 light guns per and resorting under a battalion in battle.
The Senior Officers
Above I have explained that on the battlefield a number of battalions would form a brigade. This also explains that a brigadier-general or brigadier is the lowest ranking of the generals. To explain the higher ranks top down:
| France | United Provinces | England |
| General4 (i.e. the King) | Captain General (the Stadholder) | Captain General |
| Maréchal de France5 | Fieldmarshall | Commander in Chief of the Forces6 |
| Capitaine General7 | General of Infantry/Cavalry | General of Infantry/Cavalry |
| Lieutenant General | Lieutenant General | Lieutenant General |
| Maréchal de Camp | Generaal Majoor | Major General |
| Brigadier | Brigadier | Brigadier |
| Colonel/Mestre de camp8 | Colonel | Colonel |
Notes
| 1) The Europische Mercurius for 1703 under February page 122 has the statement that the Bavarian army's old regiments consisted of 15 companies of 140 men each, forming three battalions. |
| 2) Taken from: Batailles Françaises VI, Les Armées sous l'ancien régime page 24 a.f. |
| 3) Lieutenant translates as Lieu (place) tenant (from tenir, holder) |
| 4) This is the reason there were no 'generals' in the French army. In Histoire de la Milice Françoise tome II (published 1721) page 19 it's explained that later it became common to call a commanding Maréchal de France 'General'. In their patents the king appointed these as 'My Lieutenant General'. The lower ranking were appointed as 'one of my Lieutenant Generals. |
| 5) The order really was General/Connétable/Maréchal General/Maréchal de France, but the office of Connétable was no more. Villars would become Maréchal General, but that was after the war. |
| 6) There is a lot of confusion about this rank. Also note that the King of England was the ultimate commander. |
| 7) According to Histoire de la Milice Françoise Tome II Page 25 Tessé had this title in Italy in 1702. At the time it seems to have been used as a temporal appointment in order to let one lieutenant-General command over his equals during a campaign. |
| 8) Mestre de Camp is a colonel of Cavalry |