In Europe the United Kingdom stands out as having a culture that still takes pride in its military. The English also have a long military tradition that has not been broken by a revolution or foreign occupation. This alone makes it worthwhile for English historians to still write about the generals of the Spanish Succession War. The fact that there is a far bigger market for English historians makes that books about the generals of this era still regularly appear.
|Tableau of some English Senior officers as they ranked on 1 January 1703|
|George of Denmark1|
|Earl of Riversx||1702|
|Earl of Orkneyx||1710||1702||1702||1689|
|Lord Raby (Strafford)x||1705||1702|
|Earl of Arranx||1702|
|Gus. Hamilton4||1703||1702 (1696)|
The exact order of the ranks of Generalissimo, Captain-General and Commander in Chief is not that evident. Prince George of Denmark was Generalissimo of all her majesty's forces and as such the highest ranking officer in the forces. Even this appointment was not a single appointment. On 20 May Prince George was made Generalissimo of the forces in England, Ireland and elsewhere. In August 1702 he was made Generalissimo of all the forces in Scotland. The allies of Queen Anne were however not prepared to let him command the alliance army on the continent and so Prince George stayed in England.
The Captain Generals
One might think that there was one Captain General in the English forces, but in fact there were more. First of all there could be a Captain General of the fleet and a Captain General of the land forces. This Captain General of the Land Forces was the highest ranking officer after the Generalissimo. In 1702 this was the Duke of Marlborough, who was appointed as Captain General of 'all troops and land forces which are or shall be allowed by Act of Parliament to be kept on foot, either at home or serving with the allies abroad.' On 10 March 1702 Marlborough was also appointed as: 'General of all the land forces raised in England, Wales or Berwick and kept on foot at home or employed abroad with the Queen's allies. To contain all powers granted by King William III to Frederick Duke of Schonberg.'
Next to him there was a Captain General of the Leeward Islands6 and there could be Captain Generals of forces in other areas. Schomberg was often styled as Captain General of her majesty's forces in Spain. Furthermore the artillery had a Captain General, which was Prince George of Denmark7
The Commander in Chief of the Forces
The rank of Commander in Chief of the Forces has to be discerned from that of a simple Commander in Chief. Just like other offices of the British crown the king could appoint one Commander in Chief of the Forces in each of his dominions. In May 1702 Major General Ramsay was 'Commander in Chief of the forces in Scotland'. On 11 June 1702 Colonel Harry Mordaunt was appointed 'Commander in Chief of all the Queen's forces in Guernsey...8. When William III left for the continent in 1695 Schomberg was appointed Commander in Chief of the Forces in England on 9 May 16959. In 1705 Cutts was made Commander of her Majesty's forces in Ireland under the Duke of Ormond.
Next to that there were a lot of Commanders in Chief with more limited and even temporal powers. These appointments could e.g. refer to the command of a garrison, a convoy or a fleet and have little to do with the rank of Commander in Chief of the Forces.
The relation between the Commander in Chief of the Forces and the Captain General
Later publications often render the order between these two ranks as the Commander in Chief of the Forces outranking the Captain General. This might have been true later in the eighteenth century, but in our era it was the other way round. For this one has to consider some aspects of these commands. First of all the Captain General's power (as held by Marlborough or Ormond) had no geographical limitation. Secondly an appointment as Commander in Chief was often made on account of the absence of a higher ranking dignitary.
Because both offices were often united in one person it's a rather academic but still useful discussion to inquire about who would command in case the Captain General would be in England and someone else would be Commander in Chief of the Forces in England. For two months in 1711 this situation nearly existed when Ormond was Commander in Chief and Marlborough was still Captain General but clearly on his way out. This was of course a situation which the government did not want to continue, but supposing it would want do so: Who would be the boss in England? The answer to this is very clear: The Captain General held a formal rank as 'general' of all forces and thus outranked Ormond. Commander in Chief was a temporary dignity which made someone the boss in an area, but did not confer military rank at the time. Therefore all officers would answer to the Captain General, not to the Commander in Chief in England.
|1) Prince George of Denmark was generalissimo of all English forces|
|2) Marlborough was appointed as Captain General in 1701 before that the office was vacant.|
|3) Meinhard von Schomberg (1641-1719) saw active service in Portugal. In 1695 Schomberg had been appointed as Commander in Chief of the forces in England, but this was probably a temporary appointment.|
|4) Gustavus Hamilton (ca 1640 - 16 September 1723)|
|5) I'm still in doubt about where to rank Peterborough|
|6) The Calendar of State Papers Domestic for 1702 mentions the function of Captain General of the Leeward Islands on Page 558.|
|7) Prince George of Denmark was appointed as Captain General of the artillery on 26 June 1702, State Papers Domestic Page 140.|
|8) State Papers Domestic Page 367 mentions this appointment in the absence of the governor.|
|9) Hollandsche Mercurius 1695 page 268.|