The Dutch Navy in 1700
In 1700 the United Provinces still dominated international trade. The Dutch navy was to protect this trade, and in 1674 the Dutch had proven to effectively have the strongest navy. This word 'effectively' is very important, because in comparing navies one has to look at the effective strength and the potential strength of a navy. The effective strength sees to the number of ships that were actually equipped, the potential strength sees to the number of serviceable (after repairs) ships a nation had. Nominal strength would include those ships that were on the list, but not reparable. In 1688 the Dutch navy would again have the largest effective strength for some time, but by 1700 its effective strength made it the third navy.
The Dutch navy in 1688
The invasion of England in 1688 was the last time the United Provinces manifested themselves as a great power at sea. On 'short' notice the Dutch were able to equip a fleet that was stronger than the English. It consisted of 39 ships of more than 30 guns, 9 smaller warships and 9 burners which escorted the landing force. It would be a mistake to think that the Dutch navy therefore counted 57 ships in 1688, the potential strength was much higher. The names of the ships on this list have been taken from a contemporary source.
1688: The Dutch Invasion Fleet
| The 1688 Dutch Invasion Fleet | ||||
| Ship | Captain | Guns | 1689 orders?* | Remarks |
| Cortgene (courtine) (Z) | Lt-Adm. Evertsen | 66/50 | Y | |
| De Maes (M) | RA Van Brakel | 68 | - | Present at Beachy Head |
| Noorderkwartier (N) | RA Dick | 64 | Y | |
| Honselaersdijck (M) | Rees van R'dam | 48 | Y | |
| Noort Hollant (A) | Ph. van der Gijse | 46 | - | Present at Beachy Head |
| Gorcum (M) | Brakel | 42 | - | |
| Edam (A) | Abraham Taelman | 40/36 | - | |
| Elswout (A) | A.F. Van Zijl | 50/60 | Y | Sailed to the Mediterranean in early 1690 |
| Agatha (A) | Joan Kuyper | 50 | - | Present at Beachy Head |
| Goes (Z) | C.J. Mosselman | 30 | - | |
| Nimwegen (A) | Gerrit Hooft | 46 | - | |
| Gideon (A) | C. Polck or Baeck or Hardenbr. | 56 | - | |
| Wulpenburg (A) | A. Noorthey | 32 | - | |
| Leyden (A) | La Bastiaense/LA Herbert | 64/62 | - | |
| Gekroonde Burg (Z) | VA van der Putte | 60 | Y | Present at Beachy Head |
| Ter Veer (Z) | RA Evertsen | 60 | Y | Sailed to the Mediterranean in early 1690 |
| Sneeck (A) | Ph. van der Goes | 40/36 | - | |
| Vriesland (A) | Graef van Nassau (A) | 62 | - | Present at Beachy Head |
| Hasewint (A) | P. van der Dussen (A) | 32 | - | |
| Delft (M) | Snel | 56 | - | |
| Castricum (A) | J.E. van Basse | 50 | - | Present at Beachy Head |
| Damiaten (A) | J. Hogenhoeck | 36 | Y | |
| Wapen van Hoorn (N) | Muys | 52/44 | Y | Sailed to the Mediterranean in early 1690 |
| De Vrede (A) | P.C. Decker | 46/52 | Y | Possibly the same as Vrede in the Med. |
| De Akerboom (A) | Jan Bouwens | 56 | - | |
| Harderwijck (A) | C. van der Zaan | 44 | - | |
| De Maegt van Dort (M) | G. Callenburg/VA Almonde | 68 | - | Present at Beachy Head |
| Zeelant (A) | RA van der Dussen (A) | 62 | - | |
| Stad en Lande (A) | Pieter Laren | 48/50 | - | Present at Beachy Head |
| Oud Carspel (A) | Andries Stilte (A) | 36 | - | |
| Asperen (A) | D. Egmont van der Nieuburg | 34/36 | - | |
| Zeelant (M) | De Liefde | 46 | - | |
| Maria Elisabeth (A) | W. van der Zaen | 46 | ||
| De Beemster (A) | Hendrick Tol | 48/50 | - | |
| Schielant (M) | Van Ede | 50 | - | |
| Juffrouw Anna (A) | Dirk Schey | 34 | - | |
| Schatterhoef (A) | Arnold Manard (A) | 46 | Y | Sailed to the Mediterranean in early 1690 |
| Rotterdam (M) | Van Convent | 44 | - | |
| Burn. (M) | ? | |||
| Burn. (M) | ? | |||
| Burn. Kraanvogel (A) | W. Barentsz | ? | Y | |
| Burn. De Paeu (A) | G.J. du Pon | ? | ||
| Burn. Strombolus (A) | Daniel Roucksz. | ? | ||
| Burn. Etna (A) | S.J. de Jongh | ? | ||
| Burn. Zes gebroeders(A) | Louwrens Seelt | ? | ||
| Burn. Vesuvius (A) | Varcke Visser | ? | ||
| Burn. Maegt v. Enkhuysen (N) | ? | ? | ||
| Freg. Postillion (A) | Jan Jansz. Bout | 24 | - | |
| Freg. De Brack (A) | Comm. Willem van Cats | 24 | - | |
| Freg. Neptunus (A) | Claes Boeck | 24 | - | |
| ? | Jan Courtois | 30- | ||
| Freg. Den Briel (M) | Van Esch and Pr. of Orange | 30 | ||
| Yacht De Bruynvis | Hendrick de Veer (A) | 20 | - | |
| Freg. Bommel (A) | Comm. Dircx Steen | 24 | ||
| Freg. Mercurius (N) | Leendert Cuypers | 30 | ||
| Freg? de Somer | A. den Boer | 26-28 | ||
| Prov. Utrecht (A) | Lt-Adm. van Almonde (A) | 66 | - | left in UP, Present at Beachy Head |
| * See the table below | ||||
The Dutch Navy fighting in alliance with England
In 1688 a new era started for the Dutch, fighting as junior partners in a lasting alliance with England. The Dutch still had about 70 ships of the Line, but they would steadily man less of them. Let's have a look at the orders Admiral William III gave his fleet on 6 November 16891. The orders to go to the Mediterranean were not executed, but are there for reference. What is interesting is that in these order 30 ships of more than 30 guns are mentioned, but only about 10 can be tracked back to the 1688 list. This means that the potential strength of the Dutch navy was at least the 39 ships of the line in the invasion fleet plus 20 others mentioned in the 1689 orders making 59 ships. Supposing that another 10 were sailing around or being repaired somewhere, we come to a total of about 70 ships of the line for the Dutch at the end of 1689.
| The Dutch Fleet at the end of 1689 and its orders sorted on no. of guns/size | ||||
| Ship | Captain | Guns | Orders | Men |
| West Vrieslant (N) | VA Callenburgh | 80 | Back to the UP | 450 |
| Voorzichtigheid (M) | RA Brakel | 74 | Back to the UP | 400 |
| Vrijheid (M) | Rees | 72 | To Med. | 400 |
| Gelderland (A) | VA Almonde | 72 | To Med. | 400 |
| Walcheren (M) | LA Evertsen | 70 | Back to the UP | 400 |
| Hollandia (A) | Toll | 70 | To Med. | 360 |
| Eendracht (M) | Snelle | 70 | To Med. | 357 |
| Noort Holland (N) | RA Dick | 70 | To Med. | 300 |
| Amsterdam (A) | Graaf van Nassau | 64 | To Med. | 315 |
| Haerlem (A) | Manard | 64 | To Med. | 325 |
| Callandsoog (M) | Van Zeyl | 64 | Back to the UP | 325 |
| Gekroonde Burg (M) | VA van der Putten | 62 | Back to the UP | 350 |
| Zierikzee (Z) | RA Evertzen | 62 | To Med. | 328 |
| Veere (M) | Mosselman | 60 | Back to the UP | 300 |
| Ridderschap (M) | De Liefde | 60 | To Med. | 300 |
| Prov. Utrecht (A) | Decker | 56 | Cruise in Channel | 315 |
| Gaasterland (A) | Taelman | 52 | To Med. | 210 |
| Vrede (A) | Van Laren | 52 | To Med. | 210 |
| Elswout (A) | Van Nieuburg | 52 | Cruise in Channel | 210 |
| Wapen van Hoorn (N) | Muys | 52 | To Med. | 200 |
| Tyger (N) | Berckhout | 52 | Cruise in Channel | 200 |
| Alida (N) | Kalf | 52 | Cruise in Channel | 200 |
| Honselaarsdijk (M) | Convent | 50 | Cruise in Channel | 200 |
| Cortiene (Z) | De Boer | 50 | Cruise in Channel | 200 |
| Schattershoef (A) | Van der Goes | 46 | Cruise in Channel | 210 |
| Europa (F) | Hidde de Vries | 48 | Back to the UP | 170 |
| Vlaardingen (N) | Pael | 46 | To Med. | 170 |
| De Winthont (F) | Jentema | 34 | To Med. | 150 |
| De Brack (F) | Dirck de Vries | 36 | To Med. | 150 |
| Damiaten (A) | Van Gijsen | 36 | Cruise in Channel | 140 |
| Phoenix (M) | Cap. Brakel | 26 | Cruise in Channel | 110 |
| Freg. Kroonvogel (M) | Com. Regat | 14 | Back to the UP | 50 |
| Frigat (N) | Com. Gros | 14 | Back to the UP | 42 |
| Bur. Vesuvius (A) | Com. du Pon | - | To Med. | ? |
| Bur. Maegt v. Enkhu.(N) | Com. Muysevanger | 6 | To Med. | 22 |
| Bur. Zes Gebroeders (A) | Com. de Jonge | 6 | Cruise in Channel | 22 |
| Bur. Etna (M) | Com. Antonisse | 6 | Back to the UP | 22 |
The Dutch Fleet in the Battle of Beachy Head
The role of the Dutch fleet in this battle is described in the battle of Beachy Head
The Dutch fleet at Barfleur
The Battle of Barfleur saw about 27 Dutch to about 56 English ships of the line. Particulars about this are in the battle of Barfleur
Decline of the Dutch fleet in the 1690's?
It's often supposed that though the Dutch built a reasonable number of good ships in the 1690's the strength of the fleet decreased in the 1690's. For this we have the below table of Dutch ships actually serving in 1696, taken from appendix XIX of the 'Geschiedenis van het Nederlandsche Zeewezen'10. It was aggregated by the author from lists provided by Almonde, Van Zijl and archives of the admiralties. The list does make clear that an appraisal of Dutch navy is not only about the main battle fleet, but also about counting all the ships that were engaged in other duties.
| Dutch Navy ships actually serving in 1696 | ||||
| Ship | Captain | Guns | Men | Remarks |
| The Battle fleet | ||||
| Vrijheid (A) | LA van Almonde | 96 | 550 | Med. 1705 |
| Zeven provinciën (M) | VA van Callenburgh | 90 | 525 | Med. 1702; 1705 |
| Zeelandia (Z) | VA Gel. Evertsen | 90 | 550 | |
| Kon. Willem (Z) | RA N.A. den Boer | 90 | 530 | |
| West Vriesland (N) | RA Muys | 90 | 500 | |
| Prinses Maria (A) | Graaf van Nassau | 92 | 500 | |
| Unie (A) | Van der Dussen | 94 | 500 | Med. 1705 |
| Beschermer (N) | De Boer | 90 | 475 | Med. 1705 |
| Eerste Edele (Z) | Mosselman | 74 | 400 | |
| Ridderschap (M) | RA Ph. van der Goes | 72 | 400 | |
| Dordrecht (M) | E. de Liefde | 72 | 375 | Med. 1702 |
| Holland (M) | A. Pieterson | 72 | 375 | Med. 1702 |
| Maze (M) | J. van der Goes | 72 | 375 | |
| Deventer (A) | A. van Toll | 72 | 400 | Med. 1705 |
| Katwijk (A) | Van Laeren | 72 | 400 | Med. 1702; 1704 |
| Slot Muyden (A) | Ph. Schryver | 72 | 400 | Med. 1702; 1705 |
| Elswout (A) | Draex | 72 | 375 | Med. 1705 |
| Gouda (A) | A. Manart | 72 | 400 | Med. 1702 |
| Holland (A) | Hogenhoeck | 72 | 375 | Med. 1705 |
| Walcheren (Z) | La Palma | 72 | 400 | Med. 1705 |
| Maagd v. Enkhuizen (N) | J. de Jongh | 72 | 375 | |
| Noorderkwartier (N) | Bolck | 72 | 375 | Built 1690 sold ca 1720 |
| Munnikendam (N) | Reijnhals | 72 | 375 | |
| Alkmaar (N) | Roos | 72 | 375 | Med. 1702; 1705 |
| Veluwe (M) | Van Convent | 66 | 340 | Med. 1702 |
| Zeeland (M) | Van Regteren | 64 | 325 | |
| Leijden (A) | Graaf v. Bentheim | 64 | 325 | |
| Haarlem (A) | J. Bar. van Wassenaar | 64 | 325 | |
| Amsterdam (A) | Van der Gysen | 64 | 325 | |
| Banier (A) | Lynslager | 64 | 325 | |
| Dieren (A) | Beeckman | 64 | 325 | |
| Dom v. Utrecht (A) | Jolle Jollesz | 64 | 325 | |
| Zierikzee (Z) | Boom | 64 | 325 | Med. 1705 |
| Frisia (F) | Stoffel Middagten | 64 | 310 | |
| Prins Friso (F) | Bar. J. van Ghendt | 64 | 310 | |
| Wassenaer (M) | Corn. van Brakel | 60 | 325 | |
| Delft (M) | Zas v.d. Bossche | 50 | 210 | |
| Vrede (A) | Swaan | 50 | 210 | |
| Medemblik (N) | Poeleway | 50 | 210 | |
| Sneek (A) | Leyden a Leeuwen | 44 | 165 | |
| Valkenier (N) | Van Veen | 40 | 160 | |
| Schoonoord (A) | Teenhgs | 30 | 110 | |
| Zeist (Z) | Coorde | 30 | 130 | |
| The North Sea fleet | ||||
| Het Loo (A) | Van Zyll | 64 | 325 | |
| Wapen van Utrecht (N) | Grauw | 64 | 325 | |
| Arnhem (N) | Cromhout | 64 | 325 | |
| Aemilia (F) | Beyma | 58 | 275 | Med. 1705 |
| Goes (Z) | Wiltschut | 54 | 250 | |
| Vlissingen (Z) | Tresel | 54 | 250 | Med. 1705 |
| De Zon (A) | Van Genderen | 52 | 230 | |
| Nijmegen (A) | J. Erasmus | 50 | 210 | Med. 1704 |
| Damiaten (A) | Sommelsdyck | 50 | 210 | |
| Prov. Utrecht (M) | Wass. Starrenburgh | 48 | 210 | |
| Noord Holland (A) | Roncke | 46 | 180 | |
| Drakensteyn (A) | Regoot | 44 | 165 | |
| Cortgene (Z) | Courte | 44 | 208 | |
| Mercurius (Z) | Danckers | 40 | 220 | |
| Groenwijf | Sincke Binckes | 36 | 140 | |
| Kruidberg | Comm. Toll de Jonge | 30 | 110 | |
| Escort ships | ||||
| Ripperda (A) | De Veer | 50 | 210 | |
| Muiderburg (A) | Van de Perre | 50 | 210 | |
| Schiedam (M) | Van der Pot | 50 | 210 | |
| Wapen v.d. Schermer (A) | C. Hogenhoeck | 44 | 200 | |
| Edam (A) | Comm. Hubert | 44 | 165 | |
| Gorcum (M) | Comm. Heemskerk | 40 | 160 | |
| Raadhuis v Haarlem (A) | Comm. Bucking | 38 | 150 | |
| Graaf van Solms (A) | Comm. Manart de Jonge | 38 | 150 | |
| Soestdijk (A) | Kapt.lt. v.d. Bergh | 38 | 150 | |
| Beschutter (A) | Comm. Vlies | 38 | 150 | |
| Rozendaal (M) | Comm. Forman | 38 | 200 | |
| Landskroon (A) | L. Lieuwkens | 36 | 135 | |
| Anna (A) | Roemer Vlacq | 36 | 130 | |
| Schoterbroek (A) | Comm. van Royen | 34 | 110 | |
| Weldam (A) | Comm. Is. Sweers | 34 | 110 | |
| Wulpenburg (A) | Comm. Gouwenaar | 34 | 110 | |
| Wolf (A) | Comm. Bremburg | 34 | 110 | |
| Briel (M) | Van Cooperen | 34 | 110 | |
| Heusden (M) | Comm. Is. Hanedoes | 34 | 110 | |
| Rotterdam (M) | Comm. van Wyligh | 34 | 110 | |
| Oud Naarden (A) | Comm. W. Schot | 30 | 120 | |
| De Brak (A) | Zhum | 30 | 110 | |
This is followed by a table of those ships in actual service. This gives a number of ships of the line of 81 if one counts the ships with 30-38 guns. For getting the potential strength some have to be added for those ships that did not see service in 1696. When one also takes into account the modernization of the fleet towards bigger ships with heavier guns, one can only conclude that during the 1690's the Dutch navy significantly increased in strength.
| Number | guns | men |
| 8 | 90-96 | 500-550 |
| 16 | 72-74 | 375-400 |
| 15 | 60-66 | 310-340 |
| 12 | 50-58 | 210-275 |
| 10 | 40-48 | 160-210 |
| 20 | 30-38 | 110-150 |
| 13 | 20-26 | 75-136 |
| 8 | 8-18 | 40-120 |
| 9 | burners | 22 |
The Dutch fleet in the War of the Spanish Succession
During the War of the Spanish Succession the Dutch still had a good navy, but its effective strength would drop far below that of the English. Based on countings I would put the effective strengh of the Dutch navy during the War of the Spanish Succession at about 50 mainly small ships of the line. Of these 10-15 of the largest would each year sail with the English in the Mediterranean, about 10 would be in the North Sea of before Dunkirk and perhaps two dozen others were on various convoy duties. The real significance of this is however not in the numbers, but in the fact that the Dutch opted to oppose the Guerre de Course and left the direct struggle for control of the seas to the English.
The matters of how strong the Dutch navy was and whether it was crippled by the War of the Spanish Succession could be answered by checking which of the above ships were serving in 1702 or later, what happened to them and which new ships were built. I've tried to do so here, but the list is rather incomplete.
| Dutch Navy ships during the War of the Spanish Succession | ||||
| Ship | Captain | Guns | Direct source11 | Other sources12 |
| Zeven Provincien (M) | VA Van der Goes 02 | 92 | Vigo 1702; Lisbon 1705 | wrecked 1706 |
| Vrijheid (A) | Almonde 05 | 96 | Hol. 1702; Lisbon 05; Barcelona 1705 | L. 1695, bu 1723 |
| Unie (A) | RA Wassenaar 02, 05 | 94 | Vigo 1702; Malaga 1704; Lisbon 1705 | L. 1692 bu 1721 |
| Beschermer (N) | Van der Goes 05 | 90 | Lisbon 1705; Med. 1707 | |
| Prins Willem (A) | van Gent | 92 | Med. 1707 | L. 1688 bu 1718 |
| Amsterdam (A) | 96 | L. 1712, bu 1737 | ||
| Kv. v. Brandenburg (A) | 92 | L. 1688 bu 1715 | ||
| Kvi. v. Brandenburg (A) | 92 | L. 1688 bu 1715 | ||
| Katwijk (A) | Beekman 02 | 72 | Vigo 1702; Malaga 1704 | L. 1694, bu 1724 |
| (Slot) Muyden | Schryver 02; Jollesen | 72 | Vigo 1702; Lisbon 1705 | L. 1692, bu 1732 |
| Reigersbergen (A) | Lijnslager 02, Schrijver 05 | 72 | Vigo 1702, Lisbon 1705 | L. 1693, bu 1721 |
| Dordrecht (M) | Van der Pott 02 | 72 | Vigo 1702, Malaga 1704 | |
| Holland (M) | Convent/Callenburg 02 | 72 | Vigo 1702, Barcelona 1705 | |
| Alkmaar (N?) | Pieterson 02, Goes 05 | 72 | Vigo 1702; Lisbon 1705 | |
| Monnikendam (N) | 72 | 1703 drifted; Med. 1707 | Built 1691 s. 1720 | |
| Nijmegen (A) | H. Lijnslager 04+ | 72 | Malaga 1704 | L. 1694, bu 1722 |
| Eerste Edele (Z) | RA Boom 08 | 74 | 1703 equip., 1708 Dunkirk | |
| Walcheren (Z) | Nossen 05 | 70 | 1704 equip., Lisbon 1705, 1708 to Dunkirk | |
| Deventer (A) | De Veer 05 | 72 | Barcelona 1705; Med. 1707 | L. 1694, bu 1720 |
| Utrecht | 72 | Med. 1707 | ||
| Ridderschap (M) | Van Convent | 72 | Med. 1707 | |
| P. Utrecht (A) | 72 | 1712 at Mahon | L. 1703, bu 1725 | |
| Zeelandia (A) | 72 | 1712 at Mahon; for sale 1716 | L. 1710, s. 1717 | |
| Rotterdam (M) | Starrenburg 05 | 74 | Lisbon 1705, 1711 Portsm.; 1712 at Mahon | |
| Gelderland (A) | Kopere 05 | 72 | 1705 Lisbon, 1715 Danzig | L. 1711, s. 1717 |
| Noorderkwartier (N) | 72 | Built 1690 s. 1720 | ||
| Elswout (A) | Sommelsdijk 05 | 72 | 1705 Lisbon | L. 1691, bu 1721 |
| Hollandia (A) | 72 | Livorno 1710; for sale 1716 | L. 1702, bu 1725 | |
| Zeven Steden | Nieustadt 05 | 72 | Lisbon 1705 | |
| Veluwe (M) | Wassenaar Sta. 02 | 64 | Vigo 1702; Gibr. 1704 | |
| Gouda (A) | Sommelsdijk 02 | 64 | Vigo 1702 | bu 1720 |
| Albemarle (N) | Bolck | 64 | 1702 Zeeland; 1703 Portugal; S. after Malaga 1704 | |
| Zierikzee (Z) | Tressel 05 | ca 60 | equip 1702; Lisbon 1705 | |
| Wassenaar (M) | 64 | Med. 1707 | ||
| Veere | 60 | Med. 1707 | ||
| Banier (A) | 64 | Malaga 1704, Med. 1707 | L. 1691, bu 1718 | |
| Loo (A) | 64 | Med. 1707 | L. 1693, bu 1716 | |
| Aemilia (A) | Beeckman 04; 05, Dussen 05 | 64 | Gibr. 1704; Gibr. 1705; Med. 1707? | L. 1699, bu 1727 |
| Pr. Amilia (?) | Leeuwen 05 | 52 | Lisbon 1705 | L. 1699, bu 1727 |
| Frisia (F) | Middagten | 64 | Gibr. 1704; Malaga 1704 | |
| Leeuw (A) | Veth 08 | 64 | Malaga 1704; Med. 1707; 1708 Dunkirk; 1712 at Mahon | L. 1700, bu 1714 |
| W. van Utrecht (N?) | Bolk | 64? | Gibr. 1704; Malaga 1704; Med. 1707; Livorno 1710 | Sunk Feb 1710 |
| Daelem (A) | Nieuwenhuis 11 | 64 | 1711 Lisbon; 1712 at Mahon | L. 1708, s. 1717 |
| Loosdrecht (A) | 64 | 1712 at Mahon | L. 1710, bu 1739 | |
| Arnhem (N) | Roos 11 | 64 | 1711 Lisbon; 1712 at Mahon | |
| Raadhuis v. Edam (A) | 64 | L. 1700, bu 1727 | ||
| Prin Friso (A) | 64 | 1710 Livorno | L. 1708, s. 1717 | |
| Boetzelaer (A) | 64 | L. 1711, bu 1739 | ||
| Vlissingen (Z) | Okkerse 05; Coorde 05 | 54 | 1703 equip.; Malaga 1704; 1705 Gibraltar | |
| Veere (Z) | 54 | 1703 equip.; 1705 Lisbon; 1706 Lisbon | ||
| Muiderberg (A) | Roemer Vlak | 52 | Burned in battle of Laroque 1703 | |
| Overijssel (A) | Pieterson, Boudaan 05 | 52 | 1705 Lisbon, 1708 Dunkirk | L. 1696, bu 1728 |
| Nieuwenhuis (A) | Teengs 05; Ofzen 11 | 52 | Texel 1705; 1711 Lisbon | L. 1700, bu 1731 |
| Kaysersweert (A) | J. van den Bosch | 52 | Edinburgh 1705, 1708 Dunkirk | L. 1700?, bu 1728 |
| Schieland (M?) | 50 | Med. 1707 | ||
| Zon (A) | Comm. van Kerchem | 52 | Dunkirk 1708 | L. 1694, bu 1723 |
| Batavier (A) | Francken | 52 | Dunkirk 1708 | L. 1699, bu 1724 |
| Schattershoef (A) | 50 | L. 1672, bu 1713 | ||
| Ripperda (A) | 52 | L. 1691, bu 1719 | ||
| Damiaten (A) | 52 | Malaga 1704 | L. 1693, bu 1713 | |
| Morgenster (A) | 52 | L. 1694, bu 1719 | ||
| Hof van Rhenen (A) | 52 | L. 1700, bu 1729 | ||
| Curaçao (A) | 52 | L. 1704, bu 1729 | ||
| Oosterwijk (A) | 52 | 1704 North sea | L. 1704, bu 1734 | |
| Den Brakel (A) | 52 | L. 1709, bu 1735 | ||
| Duinrel (A) | 52 | L. 1712, bu 1736 | ||
| Ter Meer (A) | 52 | L. 1713, bu 1741 | ||
| Schiedam | Boreel 05 | 52 | Gibr. 1705 | L. 1713, bu 1741 |
| Zeeland (M) | 46? | 1711 Portsmouth; 1712 at Mahon | ||
| Gaasterland | Comm. Thys de Wit | 46 | 1703 Capt. in battle of La Roque | |
| Grijpskerk (A) | 40 | L. 1689, bu 1713 | ||
| Drakestein (A) | 44 | L. 1692, bu 1717 | ||
| Kampen (A) | 44 | L. 1699, bu 1726 | ||
| Raadh. Haarlem (A) | 44 | L. 1699, bu 1724 | ||
| Diepenheim (A) | 44 | 1708 Dunkirk | L. 1700, bu 1724 | |
| Vredenhof (A) | 44 | 1711 Lisbon | L. 1709, bu 1730 | |
| Edam (A) | 44 | L. 1711, bu 1739 | ||
| Schermer | 43 | 1703 Capt. in battle of La Roque | ||
| Anna (A) | 38 | L. 1688, bu 1713 | ||
| Landscroon (A) | 34 | Med. 1707 | L. 1689, bu 1713 | |
| Freg. Beschutter (A) | 38 | Vigo 1702; Lisbon 1705 | L. 1692, bu 1717 | |
| Freg. Grijpende wolf (A) | 38 | Vigo 1702 | L. 1692, bu 1719 | |
| Freg. Schoterbos (A) | 38 | Vigo 1702 | L. 1693, bu 1717 | |
| Freg. Mars (A) | 38 | L. 1701, bu 1724 | ||
| Freg. Schoonoord (A) | 38 | L. 1701, bu 1732 | ||
| Freg. Kraai (A) | 38 | L. 1704, bu 1733 | ||
| Freg. Rozendaal (M) | Kpt. A. Boreel | 38 | Capt. in battle of La Roque | |
| Freg. Rotterdam (M) | Kpt. Samuel Forman | 34 | Capt. in battle of La Roque | |
| Nassau (Z) | Maurignault | ? | 1708 Dunkirk, 1712 at Mahon | |
| Freg Heemskerk | ? | Vigo 1702 | ||
| Freg Gorcum | ? | Vigo 1702 | ||
| Freg. Grave | ? | Vigo 1702 | ||
Potential strength of the Dutch navy during and after the War of the Spanish Succession
One then has to try to work this over to get a view of how many ships could potentially be put to sea. During the War of the Spanish Succession most of the above ships did see some action, some ships were lost and some new ships were built. One could therefore be tempted to think that the potential strength of the Dutch navy did not dramatically decrease. Providing that few ships were lost the potential strength could only diminish as ships gradually became too old to be servicable. In potential strength the mainstay of the Dutch navy were the ships built during the Nine Years War. These reached the end of their life span after about 25-30 years, and so the potential strength of the Dutch navy was still quite high in 1713.
However, right after the war a rigorous cost-cutting programm set in. In stead of replacing a part of these aging ships they were simply broken up. It was even worse than this because even a lot of the newer ships were broken up or sold. This policy that kind of assumed that the United Provinces would not soon be engaged in a major war and therefore did not need a large navy in the short term. The real economic interest of the United Provinces however demanded a navy that could enforce the free trade of its citizens whatever the international circumstances. The much smaller navy after the war was a signal to all other powers that they could easily start to take measures to strengthen their own trade by restricting the Dutch trading.
Notes
| 1) Hollandse Mercurius van het jaar 1689, page 158 has these orders given for the fleet on 27 October 1689 |
| 2) Hollandse Mercurius under July 1690, page |
| 10) Geschiedenis van het Nederlansche Zeewezen deel 3 |
| 11) Direct Source reflects mention of the ship in the Heinsius Archive; also Europische Mercurius for 1703 for the Vigo OOB; |
| 12) Other sources: De Admiraliteit van Amsterdam in rustige jaren1713-1751, by J.R. Bruijn Scheltema and Holkema 1971, for the Amsterdam ships; Resoluties Holland for Munnikendam and Noorderkwartier getting sold ca 1720. |